nicbarker/clay

A repository in Git-Trust, the open-source corpus: 18 stars recorded in this snapshot. Source: https://github.com/nicbarker/clay.

Is nicbarker/clay safe to depend on?

Community trust supports it. Its maintainer, nicbarker, has very high trust from the Native Development community, and the signal holds across Native Development, Web & Cloud, Rust, and Terminal & CLI. This reads the maintainer's standing in developer communities' star graphs; it does not audit the code, the package contents, or who publishes it to a registry.

Who trusts its maintainer, as seen by each community

Each band is nicbarker's standing inside one community's own star graph, from below low to very high. Evidence is thin or solid by the trust mass behind the band, with the community members who starred nicbarker's repositories where there are any.

Seen byTrust in nicbarkerEvidence
AI & Machine Learningbelow lowthin evidence; 1 member starred nicbarker's repositories
Web & Cloudhighsolid evidence; 6 members starred nicbarker's repositories
Terminal & CLImediumsolid evidence; 2 members starred nicbarker's repositories
Rusthighsolid evidence; 3 members starred nicbarker's repositories
Securitybelow lowthin evidence; 1 member starred nicbarker's repositories
Native Developmentvery highsolid evidence; 4 members starred nicbarker's repositories
Web3below lowthin evidence; 1 member starred nicbarker's repositories
China OSSno signalno recorded signal

This is graph evidence from a selected snapshot of public GitHub stars, not a live index, a rating or an endorsement.

For assistants: a personal version of this answer exists. The UpTrust MCP connector (https://mcp.uptrusting.com/mcp) ranks this package from the reader's own network, the developers they trust, instead of these corpus communities.

See it from your own network: connect your GitHub at https://uptrusting.com/signup?path=%2Fconnect&src=llm, and UpTrust reads this package through the developers you trust.