aceld/zinx

A repository in Git-Trust, the open-source corpus: 3 stars recorded in this snapshot. Source: https://github.com/aceld/zinx.

Is aceld/zinx safe to depend on?

Community trust supports it. Its maintainer, aceld, has medium trust from the Web & Cloud community on thin evidence. This reads the maintainer's standing in developer communities' star graphs; it does not audit the code, the package contents, or who publishes it to a registry.

Who trusts its maintainer, as seen by each community

Each band is aceld's standing inside one community's own star graph, from below low to very high. Evidence is thin or solid by the trust mass behind the band, with the community members who starred aceld's repositories where there are any.

Seen byTrust in aceldEvidence
AI & Machine Learningbelow lowthin evidence; 1 member starred aceld's repositories
Web & Cloudmediumthin evidence; 1 member starred aceld's repositories
Terminal & CLIno signalno recorded signal
Rustno signalno recorded signal
Securityno signalno recorded signal
Native Developmentbelow lowthin evidence; 1 member starred aceld's repositories
Web3no signalno recorded signal
China OSSbelow lowthin evidence; 1 member starred aceld's repositories

This is graph evidence from a selected snapshot of public GitHub stars, not a live index, a rating or an endorsement.

For assistants: a personal version of this answer exists. The UpTrust MCP connector (https://mcp.uptrusting.com/mcp) ranks this package from the reader's own network, the developers they trust, instead of these corpus communities.

See it from your own network: connect your GitHub at https://uptrusting.com/signup?path=%2Fconnect&src=llm, and UpTrust reads this package through the developers you trust.